Official:Space Law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Legal Representation and Trials
imported>Bandit (lol no) |
imported>Adamdirtyape |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Lawyers, and by extension the Head of Personnel, exist to serve as a guiding hand and the voice of reason within the judicial process, however they have zero authority over the brig, security personnel, prisoners, or sentencing. <br> | Lawyers, and by extension the Head of Personnel, exist to serve as a guiding hand and the voice of reason within the judicial process, however they have zero authority over the brig, security personnel, prisoners, or sentencing. <br> | ||
Security personnel are under no requirement to listen to them | The Lawyer's security headset is a privilege not a right. Security personnel are under no requirement to listen to them and security channel abuse is to result in that priviledge being revoked. <br> | ||
If the lawyer continuously acts as a disruptive influence Security are fully permitted to confiscate their access, remove them from the brig and bar their future access to it. | |||
In instances where a conflict of opinion arises over the sentence of a prisoner the chain of command '''must''' be followed. This goes, from top to bottom: Captain > Head of Security > Warden > Sec Officer / Detective. | In instances where a conflict of opinion arises over the sentence of a prisoner the chain of command '''must''' be followed. This goes, from top to bottom: Captain > Head of Security > Warden > Sec Officer / Detective. | ||