Guide to security: Difference between revisions

Guide to security (view source)

Revision as of 21:16, 30 March 2016

247 bytes removed , 21:16, 30 March 2016

→‎Lethal Force / Executions: Hide yo wife hide yo rule precedents cause' they rewording errything up in here

Anonymous user

imported>Atlanta-Ned

@@ Line 129: / Line 129: @@
 * If someone is shooting at you with lethal weaponry you are free to respond in kind.
-* Once you have someone stunned and cuffed, there is no excuse to not take them to the brig/permabrig if they aren't one of the above listed threats. Beating a common criminal, who is already down and unable to fight back, to death is shit. ''But do remember that several antags have ways to quickly recover from stuns and even pop out of their cuffs, beating antags to death might be the smart thing to do.''
+* Once you have someone stunned and cuffed, there is no excuse to not take them to the brig/permabrig if they aren't one of the above listed threats. Beating a common criminal, who is already down and unable to fight back, to death is shit. ''Some circumstances may change this. Don't let your guard down.''
-* Executions are to be authorized by the Captain or acting Captain, if available. If '''neither''' are available, it is up to the HoS or acting HoS. If security are in agreement that the Captain is a condom, they may skip to the HoS, but whoever that is will be held accountable if they authorize shitty executions without understanding fully the crimes.
+* Executions are to be authorized by the Captain or acting Captain, if available. If '''neither''' are available, it is up to the HoS or acting HoS. If security are in agreement that the Captain is unfit for command, they may defer to the HoS. ''Whoever authorizes an execution will ultimately be held responsible.''
-* When considering whether or not to execute someone, consider their crimes; did they murder people with an ebow, or did they just emag 1-2 doors with an emag? The former is something reasonable to execute them, the latter you could stick them with a lethal chemical implant and tell them to be good or enjoy death. ''Remember borging exists, it removes a potentially dangerous criminal from the round but also doesn't involve locking a player in a small cell for an hour. Ask them if they want to be paroled as a borg, if they're shit afterwards it is adminhelpable.''
+* When considering whether or not to execute someone, consider their crimes; did they murder people with an ebow, or did they just emag 1-2 doors? It's perfectly reasonable to execute someone for the former. Yes, you could execute someone for emagging as well, but consider sticking them with a lethal chemical implant or even sending them to be borged. Neutralizing a threat posed by an antagonist is reasonable, but removing that player from the round is dishonorable.
 * In instances where nonlethal force is not an option or not a good idea, e.g. someone in space breaking into the Armory, firing lasers at them through the windows isn't going to get you in trouble.
-* Revolution is a special case for execution authorization, considering everyone is swarming you at once, so use your best judgement. Do remember that implants exist for a reason.
+* Revolution is a special case for execution authorization, considering everyone is swarming you at once, so use your best judgement. Don't forget your loyalty implants!
 * See the [[Rules]] section for more details.