Lawyer: Difference between revisions

9 bytes added ,  21:09, 20 December 2020
→‎Common Overcharges: Actioned Council Vote 722, comments out reference to EOTC
(→‎Common Overcharges: Actioned Council Vote 722, comments out reference to EOTC)
Line 115: Line 115:
*'''Grand Sabotage vs. Creating a Workplace Hazard:''' Unless intent can be proven, argue that your client is not malicious, just completely incompetent.
*'''Grand Sabotage vs. Creating a Workplace Hazard:''' Unless intent can be proven, argue that your client is not malicious, just completely incompetent.
*'''Grand Theft vs. Theft and Major Trespass vs. Trespass:''' Make sure that security doesn't take a liberal interpretation of the serious charges.
*'''Grand Theft vs. Theft and Major Trespass vs. Trespass:''' Make sure that security doesn't take a liberal interpretation of the serious charges.
*'''Enemy of the Corporation:''' Be very wary of this charge, it is often thrown out there when security wants to permabrig someone and doesn't have grounds.
<!-- *'''Enemy of the Corporation:''' Be very wary of this charge, it is often thrown out there when security wants to permabrig someone and doesn't have grounds. -->
*'''Repeat Offender:''' Security will try to use this permabrig the clown for slipping people with a banana peel twice or whatever. Try not to let them.
*'''Repeat Offender:''' Security will try to use this permabrig the clown for slipping people with a banana peel twice or whatever. Try not to let them.


Wiki Director
287

edits