Talk:Rules: Difference between revisions
imported>Giacom (This might need updating.) |
imported>LiamLime (This page needs to be taken out back and shot.) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This might need updating. 15: | This might need updating. [[User:Giacom|Giacom]] ([[User talk:Giacom|talk]]) 15:40, 14 November 2013 (CET) | ||
yes, yes it does. Unwritten policies decided upon in secret in adminbus seem to be the flavour of the month for some reason. Let's hope this changes. | |||
<blockquote>"'''Don’t metagame. Don’t play to win.'''"</blockquote> | |||
but this is /tg/station? | |||
== This page is disgusting == | |||
This page needs to be taken out back and shot. Then a new one can be written. If you bring a new player here and expect them to read this crap, there will be no new player left by the time they get to rule 3. Even in the first set of 11 rules, there are lots of duplicates. Many rules are needlessly verbose and just written in a horribly unwelcoming way. The page is moderated, so none of us can actually help with it. Those of you who can, though, really need to take the effort and improve this page. It's actually one of those important ones. I know people have an obsession with "policies", thinking "more policies ===== better", but good god, take a step back and look at this page (don't bother reading it, it's rubbish), and then reconsider whether that obsession still holds water. --[[User:LiamLime|LiamLime]] ([[User talk:LiamLime|talk]]) 09:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:14, 24 November 2015
This might need updating. Giacom (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2013 (CET)
yes, yes it does. Unwritten policies decided upon in secret in adminbus seem to be the flavour of the month for some reason. Let's hope this changes.
"Don’t metagame. Don’t play to win."
but this is /tg/station?
This page is disgusting
This page needs to be taken out back and shot. Then a new one can be written. If you bring a new player here and expect them to read this crap, there will be no new player left by the time they get to rule 3. Even in the first set of 11 rules, there are lots of duplicates. Many rules are needlessly verbose and just written in a horribly unwelcoming way. The page is moderated, so none of us can actually help with it. Those of you who can, though, really need to take the effort and improve this page. It's actually one of those important ones. I know people have an obsession with "policies", thinking "more policies ===== better", but good god, take a step back and look at this page (don't bother reading it, it's rubbish), and then reconsider whether that obsession still holds water. --LiamLime (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)